>___>"
Geez, you guys are so far off base, its kind of funny.
Why would I even risk it? Seraph had 1 extra vote that got the lynch. Why the hell would an assassin risk that?
I told you already, I didn't know what the general public felt about Assassins, so I couldn't say "Seraph is Ezio, lets kill him".
Everyone was so happy with a Templar Death on Day 1, made it seem like everyone was on the Assassin's side.
I already said, its a piss-poor way to play and I don't expect half of you to believe me. But I'd die before spreading a rolesheet/role out just because a few of you think she is bad because she hasn't been an active poster. I could understand, to a degree, how she could be viewed wrongly, but when you compare her to Misaka? Is there even a debate there? Misaka has done everything rina has done + lots more.
Yet you two are hell-bent on saying Rina is bad and Misaka isn't. Explanation?
(Also, my internet is crapping out. I might not reply right away, I do apologize)
Geez, you guys are so far off base, its kind of funny.
Why would I even risk it? Seraph had 1 extra vote that got the lynch. Why the hell would an assassin risk that?
I told you already, I didn't know what the general public felt about Assassins, so I couldn't say "Seraph is Ezio, lets kill him".
Everyone was so happy with a Templar Death on Day 1, made it seem like everyone was on the Assassin's side.
I already said, its a piss-poor way to play and I don't expect half of you to believe me. But I'd die before spreading a rolesheet/role out just because a few of you think she is bad because she hasn't been an active poster. I could understand, to a degree, how she could be viewed wrongly, but when you compare her to Misaka? Is there even a debate there? Misaka has done everything rina has done + lots more.
Yet you two are hell-bent on saying Rina is bad and Misaka isn't. Explanation?
(Also, my internet is crapping out. I might not reply right away, I do apologize)