Murder Mystery AG: DT [Game Over]
- Thread starter VivaLaDementia
- Start date
- Status
No. Actually you just strengthened the theory that Notorious is in fact an "Assassin". He played 1 AG and in that 1 AG he was a "good guy", so no, he has no experience in being the "bad guy". He'll do the basics of course, initiate suspicion but he forced it too much and it's noticeable.
This was Posted at 8:10am my time zone. GM's Last edit at Post#4 was 8:04 am. 1st reply by a player was 8:07 am.
6minutes into the game he already accused us of being lurkers. Why? Didn't he thought that I was in the middle of reading the story? What's his point?
I ignored it. I said to myself "Fine. It's probably just a joke for some strange reason". But no I was wrong with that....
"Let's do this." A pretty common phrase. Trivial.
This, another malicious question. It hit me. This guy is forcing things to anyone to make sure that the people will be occupied with suspicions. He is stirring things up. (Too bad it didn't work)
You might say that an expert and experienced player will not do this but it doesn't apply here. It's his first time in being an assassin. He'll commit these mistakes.
No other information is given. This is an opening I'm willing to take. It's a risk but an error on his part might be forgotten and it will be a shame if it does turn out that he was an assassin. If he isn't, then the assassins can hypothetically finish it in Day 5 but the truth still stands that we have no cops (as of now, I believe), what other options do we have? Are you guys sure that we can catch an assassin in day 2,3 so on by just the story... if yes then good. Don't consider my suspicion but if it's also by chance then what difference does it make? Higher percentage? It's still chance.
I'm open to change. If Notorious has solid defense against his "6 minutes into the game" remarks, I'll change my vote to "No one GMV".
This was Posted at 8:10am my time zone. GM's Last edit at Post#4 was 8:04 am. 1st reply by a player was 8:07 am.
6minutes into the game he already accused us of being lurkers. Why? Didn't he thought that I was in the middle of reading the story? What's his point?
I ignored it. I said to myself "Fine. It's probably just a joke for some strange reason". But no I was wrong with that....
"Let's do this." A pretty common phrase. Trivial.
This, another malicious question. It hit me. This guy is forcing things to anyone to make sure that the people will be occupied with suspicions. He is stirring things up. (Too bad it didn't work)
You might say that an expert and experienced player will not do this but it doesn't apply here. It's his first time in being an assassin. He'll commit these mistakes.
No other information is given. This is an opening I'm willing to take. It's a risk but an error on his part might be forgotten and it will be a shame if it does turn out that he was an assassin. If he isn't, then the assassins can hypothetically finish it in Day 5 but the truth still stands that we have no cops (as of now, I believe), what other options do we have? Are you guys sure that we can catch an assassin in day 2,3 so on by just the story... if yes then good. Don't consider my suspicion but if it's also by chance then what difference does it make? Higher percentage? It's still chance.
I'm open to change. If Notorious has solid defense against his "6 minutes into the game" remarks, I'll change my vote to "No one GMV".
Yes, I voted for the GM.It was for the "lol "since I was wondering what could happen if the GM got lynched. I will change it of course. As you can see, I had no doubt in my vote, considering I started-off voting a person rather than no one.
I have other solid evidence as well, to back up the "Notorious is an assassin Theory":
1.) The mention: Why mention our names with "@". Is he making sure that gaara and me will react? Why? To cause a commotion? To start stirring and spinning the scene away from him?
2.) Why the two of us?- Why not the others as well?- placa_placa and Nightmare Gear posted before me. (our posts were less than 5 mins apart). It is my first AG. Very first AG. He probably thought that I was a low-priority target. I don't know why he picked Gaara since I don't know gaara very much but he probably has a reason too.
I stated my reasoning and it has basis. We can take the chance guys. I won't force it. You decide. As for myself,I won't let anyone stir things up with no basis 6 minutes into the game and then log out. (probably to sleep or whatnot).
I have other solid evidence as well, to back up the "Notorious is an assassin Theory":
1.) The mention: Why mention our names with "@". Is he making sure that gaara and me will react? Why? To cause a commotion? To start stirring and spinning the scene away from him?
2.) Why the two of us?- Why not the others as well?- placa_placa and Nightmare Gear posted before me. (our posts were less than 5 mins apart). It is my first AG. Very first AG. He probably thought that I was a low-priority target. I don't know why he picked Gaara since I don't know gaara very much but he probably has a reason too.
I stated my reasoning and it has basis. We can take the chance guys. I won't force it. You decide. As for myself,I won't let anyone stir things up with no basis 6 minutes into the game and then log out. (probably to sleep or whatnot).
I'm more interested in why the same people go so much after Hindrance. It is his first AG, so he may not be so fond of rules yet, but discussing is not something AG specific. And ehh, pointing out to lurkers so early is kinda meh, unless they WERE in the thread but didn't post anything. In that case, day 1 lynch~
[MENTION=1564]Hindrance[/MENTION] Honestly, I don't really have a "solid defence" cos it was just something I did without much thought or motif in it. The previous AG I played people called out lurkers yet they didn't get suspicious at all. So what's with you pointing the finger? In day one? If anything whilst everyone is going for no vote you pointing the finger at me makes "you" under suspicion too, so why go through such a risky manoeuvre?
Let me ask you something: do you think I'm "that" stupid? If I really was an assassin as you claim, then wouldn't it be better for me to lurk myself, instead of pointing out lurkers?
Oh and the tagging thing with the @? I don't have a special reason, I just do it cos I find that it's better than just saying the name itself. I genuinely wanted to see what your opinions were, but whether you believe me or not is up to you
Let me ask you something: do you think I'm "that" stupid? If I really was an assassin as you claim, then wouldn't it be better for me to lurk myself, instead of pointing out lurkers?
Oh and the tagging thing with the @? I don't have a special reason, I just do it cos I find that it's better than just saying the name itself. I genuinely wanted to see what your opinions were, but whether you believe me or not is up to you
Not good enough. You just dug your grave deeper.
1st Paragraph: You missed it, completely. I didn't mind the "two lurkers..." post alone. It was the: (and of course the mention)
Malicious Question inside and out. It was to stir things up... but it failed. It was to negate the attention from you. Perfect timing since you were about to log out and never really intended to reply. Like I said, it was just to stir and spin a couple of minds.
2nd Paragraph: I never said nor thought that you were "stupid".
I am not that kind of person, ask my friends from MF. Inexperience. You lack experience at being an assassin and therefore will commit mistakes and this is just one of them. Reverse psychology defense, not gonna work.
3rd paragraph: Then why us? Hmmm? Why not all of us there? It's because you thought that because it's my first AG, I was an easy target and will not notice it.
My statement stands. You failed to have a solid defense and my evidences and reasoning are much stronger than before thanks to it.
1st Paragraph: You missed it, completely. I didn't mind the "two lurkers..." post alone. It was the: (and of course the mention)
Malicious Question inside and out. It was to stir things up... but it failed. It was to negate the attention from you. Perfect timing since you were about to log out and never really intended to reply. Like I said, it was just to stir and spin a couple of minds.
2nd Paragraph: I never said nor thought that you were "stupid".
I am not that kind of person, ask my friends from MF. Inexperience. You lack experience at being an assassin and therefore will commit mistakes and this is just one of them. Reverse psychology defense, not gonna work.3rd paragraph: Then why us? Hmmm? Why not all of us there? It's because you thought that because it's my first AG, I was an easy target and will not notice it.
My statement stands. You failed to have a solid defense and my evidences and reasoning are much stronger than before thanks to it.
The "^do what?" was just failed sarcasm... It wasn't meant to mean much. I just don't see how just two words are so "malicious" and can cause such a stir. You underestimate the other players too much, they wouldn't be that stupid to actually believe what I said and wouldn't be stirred that much, let alone even notice it.
Even if one does lack experience, no-one would be as foolish as to start suspecting and pointing the finger at people, six minutes in as you say.
Let's be fair, all I said was that you two were lurking, which was technically true. I never tried to point the finger at either of you since I genuinely don't believe that you two are assassins. As much as I do lack experience, if I was an assassin I wouldn't go around pointing the finger six minutes in, that indeed is stupidity. Leaving the Notorious = Assassin thing aside, I can cross my heart that those two comments were just mindless posts (verging on spam). I was just excited that the game finally started and wanted more people to be involved. NG and placa both posted before me, and when I looked down whilst making my comment I just saw you two, so I did it.
You claim you have a solid defence, but I don't think that is the case. You are basing everything you have said on weak assumptions since it is day one and no one knows anything.
Even if one does lack experience, no-one would be as foolish as to start suspecting and pointing the finger at people, six minutes in as you say.
Let's be fair, all I said was that you two were lurking, which was technically true. I never tried to point the finger at either of you since I genuinely don't believe that you two are assassins. As much as I do lack experience, if I was an assassin I wouldn't go around pointing the finger six minutes in, that indeed is stupidity. Leaving the Notorious = Assassin thing aside, I can cross my heart that those two comments were just mindless posts (verging on spam). I was just excited that the game finally started and wanted more people to be involved. NG and placa both posted before me, and when I looked down whilst making my comment I just saw you two, so I did it.
You claim you have a solid defence, but I don't think that is the case. You are basing everything you have said on weak assumptions since it is day one and no one knows anything.
- Status