SOTW #5: Chosen Stock
- Thread starter Hadriel
- Start date
- Status
[quote name='Emeralda']
LIES! At least your definition, which doesn't seem to allow to really work on it, or rather, below it.[/QUOTE]
Look, this is and remains a grey area. Sure, you can remove the entire background and turn it into a render, but then what was the point of the background? You're free to do whatever you want, but after a certain amount of background is gone it becomes just absurd.
LIES! At least your definition, which doesn't seem to allow to really work on it, or rather, below it.[/QUOTE]
Look, this is and remains a grey area. Sure, you can remove the entire background and turn it into a render, but then what was the point of the background? You're free to do whatever you want, but after a certain amount of background is gone it becomes just absurd.
[quote name='Hadriel']
Look, this is and remains a grey area. Sure, you can remove the entire background and turn it into a render, but then what was the point of the background? You're free to do whatever you want, but after a certain amount of background is gone it becomes just absurd.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps, Emmie has encountered the same as me ^^ When it's Chosen Stock or Chosen Render, it's usually one or the other that's chosen. Either just a backround or a render ^^ To see what we all do with the same backround or what we can do to the same render ^^
I guess, wording with a backround that already has a focal point is kinda difficult since.. Well, there's already a focal point xD ALthough, it is challenging and I think I have something in mind xD We'll see.. Now to see if I can find the right thing I have in mind *squeals* ^^
Look, this is and remains a grey area. Sure, you can remove the entire background and turn it into a render, but then what was the point of the background? You're free to do whatever you want, but after a certain amount of background is gone it becomes just absurd.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps, Emmie has encountered the same as me ^^ When it's Chosen Stock or Chosen Render, it's usually one or the other that's chosen. Either just a backround or a render ^^ To see what we all do with the same backround or what we can do to the same render ^^
I guess, wording with a backround that already has a focal point is kinda difficult since.. Well, there's already a focal point xD ALthough, it is challenging and I think I have something in mind xD We'll see.. Now to see if I can find the right thing I have in mind *squeals* ^^
Should I be greatly appalled or not? As what you are showing to me right now, the chosen stock is a low quality one. Of course, I do agree to use this stock if I myself make low quality tags. /sarcasm
I think the stock should be changed to something of higher quality, my dear GFX staffs.
And yes, please don't use google in searching for stocks. /sarcasm
But seriously, the stock is nowhere near the good quality that we can call. It's like 1 dpi images. OTL
P.S. A high quality stock is something a GFXer can zoom to about 75% and still does not make pixels. ^^
P.P.S. I'm just voicing out what I think is right. If you don't see the need to heed to my advices then please go ahead.
I think the stock should be changed to something of higher quality, my dear GFX staffs.
And yes, please don't use google in searching for stocks. /sarcasm
But seriously, the stock is nowhere near the good quality that we can call. It's like 1 dpi images. OTL
P.S. A high quality stock is something a GFXer can zoom to about 75% and still does not make pixels. ^^
P.P.S. I'm just voicing out what I think is right. If you don't see the need to heed to my advices then please go ahead.
[quote name='Maria.']Should I be greatly appalled or not? As what you are showing to me right now, the chosen stock is a low quality one. Of course, I do agree to use this stock if I myself make low quality tags. /sarcasm
I think the stock should be changed to something of higher quality, my dear GFX staffs.
And yes, please don't use google in searching for stocks. /sarcasm
But seriously, the stock is nowhere near the good quality that we can call. It's like 1 dpi images. OTL
P.S. A high quality stock is something a GFXer can zoom to about 75% and still does not make pixels. ^^
P.P.S. I'm just voicing out what I think is right. If you don't see the need to heed to my advices then please go ahead.[/QUOTE]
Wait what?
How did the stock become like that?
Anyway, I've changed it into a URL. The stock was supposed to be HQ, but for some reason hotlinking it here diminshed the quality. My apologies.
I think the stock should be changed to something of higher quality, my dear GFX staffs.
And yes, please don't use google in searching for stocks. /sarcasm
But seriously, the stock is nowhere near the good quality that we can call. It's like 1 dpi images. OTL
P.S. A high quality stock is something a GFXer can zoom to about 75% and still does not make pixels. ^^
P.P.S. I'm just voicing out what I think is right. If you don't see the need to heed to my advices then please go ahead.[/QUOTE]
Wait what?
How did the stock become like that?
Anyway, I've changed it into a URL. The stock was supposed to be HQ, but for some reason hotlinking it here diminshed the quality. My apologies.
- Status