Mafia AG Discussion Thread [Game Over]
- Thread starter Crestham
- Start date
- Status
"We must vote" suggests there will be penalty for inactivity in the voting thread in which case there is none here. Have to make it clear, so that not just you, but everyone who reads the comment understands.
This is not an accusation, but correction. For the future of eliminating the "no vote" vote.
This is not an accusation, but correction. For the future of eliminating the "no vote" vote.
*Sanae is confused
I was under the impression that this was the discussion thread, Xiga (I think it was) o.o
Hahahaha, someone called Aidan a she lololol
First day lynch is always random. One good thing about it, it does causes people to start talking in their defense. Although, some don't really try and that causes mishaps and we end up offing an innocent :\
I was under the impression that this was the discussion thread, Xiga (I think it was) o.o
Hahahaha, someone called Aidan a she lololol
First day lynch is always random. One good thing about it, it does causes people to start talking in their defense. Although, some don't really try and that causes mishaps and we end up offing an innocent :\
In the current analysis, I must comment that I have noticed that Biomega has been making overgeneralized statements left right centre (eg. "First day is always haphazard"). Apart from contributing little to the discussion, what he said earlier about him wanting to "slice off inactives" seems to imply that he has the ability to kill players.
And Chimer has come to my attention for doing pretty much nothing but act as a jovial spectator in the current discussion.
While this is in no way absolute proof of their allegiance, it is cause for concern.
Care to comment, both of you?
And Chimer has come to my attention for doing pretty much nothing but act as a jovial spectator in the current discussion.
While this is in no way absolute proof of their allegiance, it is cause for concern.
Care to comment, both of you?
Okay. Hadriel was the last person to sheep on Aidan yesterday, without given any reason? Eh.......and today pointing fingers randomly. Like Kaze said, he's suspicious. Noex's also suspicious, *cough* why did he vote for Ray? Voting without providing good reason is just..........and something weird is going on........it seems like people sheep whoever votes for Viva..........weird..........and I mean weird.......
Hey guys, why don't you make me president 8D
Anyways, Hadriel found some small details that could be applicable to anyone and starts accusing people :\
Not cool. TBH, I'm pretty sure the assassins don't have an individual killing ability but a group kill (if it's according to the mafia game anyways)
Anyways, Hadriel found some small details that could be applicable to anyone and starts accusing people :\
Not cool. TBH, I'm pretty sure the assassins don't have an individual killing ability but a group kill (if it's according to the mafia game anyways)
I already had two votes for me yesterday: One by Kaze who mistook my normal playing style as being unusual (since he hasn't joined any AG I've joined so far) and another by goddo who got angry at my no vote post. I didn't want votes on me to suddenly surge at the last minute and propel me onto the chopping board, so I voted for the player with the most votes so far: Aidan.
And I assure you, my "pointing of fingers" isn't random, nor am I even pointing fingers. As I said, I just found their actions cause for concern. I even stated that my my observations can and should not be used to incriminate either of them.
@ Bloodrazor: As I said, I am not accusing people.
And I assure you, my "pointing of fingers" isn't random, nor am I even pointing fingers. As I said, I just found their actions cause for concern. I even stated that my my observations can and should not be used to incriminate either of them.
@ Bloodrazor: As I said, I am not accusing people.
No.
Nothing good comes from you ever >=P
On the Hadriel topic however, I am a bit curious why Hadriel changed their vote about 2 hours before the day ended, from "No Vote" to "Aidan". That + The baseless accusations he is passing out, its getting me a bit lynch-happy~
Edit: Whoops, I missed the post D:
Pretty basic tactic to give suggestions to players, without being the source of blame, is to say "Person A is suspicious for <reason>, but this is just my idea, don't take it as they are automatically guilty"
Wouldn't be the first time its been done
Nothing good comes from you ever >=P
On the Hadriel topic however, I am a bit curious why Hadriel changed their vote about 2 hours before the day ended, from "No Vote" to "Aidan". That + The baseless accusations he is passing out, its getting me a bit lynch-happy~
Edit: Whoops, I missed the post D:
Pretty basic tactic to give suggestions to players, without being the source of blame, is to say "Person A is suspicious for <reason>, but this is just my idea, don't take it as they are automatically guilty"
Wouldn't be the first time its been done
- Status